- Blurred personal and professional boundaries in electronic communication
|
I can remember unwinding with a
few colleagues on a Friday evening. We decided to go to the local bar &
restaurant, where consumption of alcohol was had, as well as a meal. One
colleague without my knowledge decided to video record an event which was
posted to Snapchat. Their Snapchat followers included children from our
school. The video recording showed the consumption of alcohol, and showed
myself being jovial. This was seen by the children, so they asked me the
following Monday if I had enjoyed my evening. The video lasted 30 seconds and
then it was deleted.
|
2.
Various sometimes competing forces, each of which
impacts on decision-making from its own particular bias
|
My colleagues decision to post the
video at the time was nothing more than showing enjoyment with the company of
others. This unfortunately led to other assumptions. Alcohol was involved, so
the people following the post had other ideas of what happened. In some ways
I understand why my colleague posted the video, but on the other hand I prefer
to keep those moments to myself and the people involved. Knowing the impact
that post had, my relationship with the children changed.
|
3.
The individual’s values, beliefs, and ethical
orientations in relation to the dilemma
|
The video was interpreted perhaps
by some as a drunken night out. Though that is far from the truth but that 30
seconds of video changed that. This perhaps for some challenged my beliefs
and values as a teacher as well as my responsibilities. But knowing what
happen during that 30 seconds I was quite content.
|
4.
The choice, which could be no action or the action
taken formally or informally, internally or externally
|
The action that was taken was no
more than a reminder to my colleagues, not to post anything online without
the permission of the people in the video. This raises awareness more than
anything else and the spirit of the moment posts, within 30 seconds, can change
what people perceive without knowing.
|
5.
The action (or non-action) can create particular
types of implications for the individual, organisation and the community,
and from which new incidents or dilemmas can arise
|
Social media is a powerful tool,
but without context, without people knowing what happen, what people see is
more of what the perceive in their own minds. This can determine the impact
you have on the school and the wider community. You can only implement
strategies that avoid incidents like the one above, which is awareness of
what you post and asking permission to post it. Moreover you have a
responsibility especially on social networks on what you post.
|
Ehrich, L. C. , Kimber M., Millwater, J. & Cranston, N.
(2011). Ethical dilemmas: a model to understand teacher practice, Teachers
and Teaching: theory and practice, 17:2, 173-185, DOI:
Kia ora Wiremu
ReplyDeleteĀe, e marama ana au ki tēnei āhuatanga. I au e noho ana ki tētahi taone iti, i kite ngā tamariki i āu ki te karapu purei whutupōro e ngahau ana, ā, ka tae ki te Mane i pērā ngā kōrerorero mō te ngahau i ngā rā whakatā, ahakoa kotahi noa iho taku unu, ka pohehe noa. Me noho haumaru tātou i a tātou e ngahau ana i ngā kamera me ngā waea. Mai i taua wā i ako au ki te kore whakaae ki ngā whakaahua i ngā wā ngahau, me te kore uru ki ngā whakaahua o ētahi atu hei whakahaumaru i au. Ki au nei, he āhuatanga o te ngaiotanga kaiako tēnei take. Me noho wehe ngā mahi pakeke o te kaiako ki ngā mahi whakaako ki te kura. Me whakaako tātou ki a tātou tamariki, a tātou taiohi e pā ana ki ngā whakatupatotanga o te whakaatu whakaahua, whakaatu kiriata o ētahi atu. I ētahi wā, he takahe mana he whakaiti hoki. Me whakaaro rātou i mua te whakairi ki te ipurangi. He tāpiritanga ki te tapuwae matihiko o te tangata, me marama ngā akonga ka noho te tapuwae matihiko i a rātou mō ake tonu.